We are using cookies to implement functions like login, shopping cart or language selection for this website. Furthermore we use Google Analytics to create anonymized statistical reports of the usage which creates Cookies too. You will find more information in our privacy policy.
OK, I agree I do not want Google Analytics-Cookies
International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry
Login:
username:

password:

Plattform:

Forgotten password?

Registration

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 38 (2018), No. 5     27. Aug. 2018
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 38 (2018), No. 5  (27.08.2018)

Page 665-671, doi:10.11607/prd.3639, PubMed:30113606


Surgical Alternatives for Treating Peri-implantitis
Sarmiento, Hector L. / Norton, Michael / Korostoff, Jonathan / Ko, Kang I. / Fiorellini, Joseph P.
The objective of this case series was to describe surgical approaches that can be used to efficiently and effectively treat peri-implantitis as measured by positive changes in clinical parameters. A total of 32 patients with 45 implants were treated surgically to eliminate peri-implantitis. Baseline clinical parameters measured prior to surgery were compared to those made 6 months postsurgery to evaluate the efficacy of each procedure. Implants demonstrating signs of peri-implantitis were treated by one of three approaches: (1) regenerative surgery, (2) osseous resective surgery, or (3) apically repositioned flap surgery. In all instances, the exposed implant surfaces were debrided and decontaminated. Relative to baseline values, regenerative surgery yielded statistically significant changes in probing depth (PD) (7.21 ± 0.27 mm to 4.09 ± 0.14 mm) and percentage of sites exhibiting bleeding on probing (BoP) (100.0% ± 0.0% to 10.6% ± 3.3%) as measured at the 6-month recall visit (P ≤ .05). The decrease in probing depth was not dependent on the type of graft material used (P ≤ .05). Resective surgery yielded statistically significant changes in PD (5.86 ± 0.23 mm to 3.63 ± 0.14 mm) and the percentage of sites exhibiting BoP (100.0% ± 0.0% to none) (P ≤ .05). Finally, the implants treated via apically repositioned flap surgery demonstrated statistically significant decreases (P ≤ .05) in both PD (6.79 ± 0.27 mm to 4.32 ± 0.16 mm) and BOP (100.0% ± 0.0% to 14.3% ± 6.7%) (P ≤ .05). Regenerative, resective, and apically positioned flap surgery can be utilized to successfully treat peri-implantitis.